We shouldn’t swap nuclear waste for mercury

Please read article, cited after the quote. Articles open in a new window.

What does a really bad idea look like? It looks like the U.S. Department of Energy’s proposal to store 17,000 tons of mercury at the Idaho National Laboratory.

That would be the same INL located a few hundred feet above the Magic Valley’s water supply.

INL is one of seven sites in the running for long-term disposal of elemental mercury, which is used in manufacturing and mining. The others are the Grand Junction Disposal Site in Colorado; the Hanford nuclear reservation in Washington state; Hawthorne Army Depot in Nevada; the Kansas City Plant in Missouri; the Savannah River site in South Carolina; and Waste Control Specialists in Andrews, Texas. DOE already stores 1,200 tons of mercury at its Oak Ridge Reservation in Tennessee.



One Response

  1. […] See the original post: We shouldn't swap nuclear waste for mercury « Nuclear and … […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: