<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The great nuclear power debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gregornot.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/the-great-nuclear-power-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gregornot.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/the-great-nuclear-power-debate/</link>
	<description>Corbin Harney's last words. "We are one people. We cannot separate ourselves now.There are many good things to be done for our people and for the world. It is important to let things be good and it is important to teach the younger generation, so that things are not lost."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aizen</title>
		<link>http://gregornot.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/the-great-nuclear-power-debate/#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator>Aizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregornot.wordpress.com/?p=2053#comment-3032</guid>
		<description>&quot;Opponents say nuclear power is inherently unsafe and a public health risk. They say utilities should instead explore solar and wind power, and promote conservation.&quot;

The first sentence exemplifies the ignorance and uneducated opinions of opponents. And the second sentence exemplifies how naive and unrealistic their ideals are. Solar and Wind cannot make up the energy America needs if they wish to wane off fossil fuels and coal. Nuclear has to play large roll. 

I don&#039;t know the exact stats but here in Canada Nuclear contributes around 32% to the grid while wind/solar contributes 3-5% at best. Are these opponents telling me that if Canada stops using nuclear, solar and wind can make up that 32%. Absolutely insane. It would cost tax payers billions and billions and would not lower emissions significantly. Look at Europe. For all their wind farms and solar, no coal plants have been closed, and C02 has not been reduced. 

I&#039;m not saying solar and wind don&#039;t play a part in our future, they absolutely do, but North America has to be pragmatic and idealistic in it&#039;s green investments. 
For more proof on the fallacies of wind and solar please read &lt;a href=&quot;http://enviralment.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/shining-some-light-on-the-realities-behind-solar-power/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;
and &gt;a href=&quot;http://enviralment.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/ontario-blows-billions-of-tax-payer-money-investing-in-wind-power/&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Opponents say nuclear power is inherently unsafe and a public health risk. They say utilities should instead explore solar and wind power, and promote conservation.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first sentence exemplifies the ignorance and uneducated opinions of opponents. And the second sentence exemplifies how naive and unrealistic their ideals are. Solar and Wind cannot make up the energy America needs if they wish to wane off fossil fuels and coal. Nuclear has to play large roll. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the exact stats but here in Canada Nuclear contributes around 32% to the grid while wind/solar contributes 3-5% at best. Are these opponents telling me that if Canada stops using nuclear, solar and wind can make up that 32%. Absolutely insane. It would cost tax payers billions and billions and would not lower emissions significantly. Look at Europe. For all their wind farms and solar, no coal plants have been closed, and C02 has not been reduced. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying solar and wind don&#8217;t play a part in our future, they absolutely do, but North America has to be pragmatic and idealistic in it&#8217;s green investments.<br />
For more proof on the fallacies of wind and solar please read <a href="http://enviralment.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/shining-some-light-on-the-realities-behind-solar-power/" rel="nofollow">this</a><br />
and &gt;a href=&#8221;http://enviralment.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/ontario-blows-billions-of-tax-payer-money-investing-in-wind-power/&#8221;&gt;this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The great nuclear power debate</title>
		<link>http://gregornot.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/the-great-nuclear-power-debate/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>The great nuclear power debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregornot.wordpress.com/?p=2053#comment-694</guid>
		<description>[...] Go to the author&#8217;s original blog: The great nuclear power debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go to the author&#8217;s original blog: The great nuclear power debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
